Re: Just to note:
|
|
Which is fine. If one is going to be sentimental about who they are taking then comparisons don't really matter. You're going to take Ekeler regardless of the other choices.Quote
JamesJM
I have a bias for Ekler.... this: Western Colorado. My oldest grandson played for them.
That's what was so nice about healthy Gurley. He could run like a full-time RB but he could catch and break long plays like a situational back. But, I'd argue that Henry is also in that category so I don't really agree that Ekeler is better than Henry in just about any metric.
But, Ekeler's easy to root for. I've got nothing against him, I just wouldn't throw all common sense out of the equation if I had a choice between him and Henry.
