Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I completely agree

May 03, 2021 08:48AM
Quote
LBRamsFan
I used to wonder why certain teams always seemed to get the best draft grades every year, teams like the Bengals and the Cardinals, while other teams like the Seahawks and Patriots could not draft worth beans. The Bengals would also seem to get the best "value" and draft well known players, while the Seahawks would draft "reaches" that no one was familiar with. And yet, despite always owning the draft the Bengals and the Cardinals never really got a lot better, while the Seahawks and the Patriots maintained solid football teams. I don't know about the Cardinals, but I later learned that the Bengals had the smallest scouting staff and the smallest budget for evaluating players.

I submit that the least knowledgeable person on this forum (i.e., me), armed with a PFF subscription or access to ESPN.com, could conduct an NFL draft and get an "A" in the post draft assessments of all the pundits. Think about that. In my experience, it forebodes neither an excellent draft class nor a poor draft class. Which is why everyone agrees these grades are pointless, and yet we still lament the absence of positive feedback on our team's newest crop of players.

Last year illustrates my point. The Rams' pick that got the highest marks for "steal" value was Terrell Lewis, while the Jordan Fuller pick (who was seen as too slow, lacked range, etc.) garnered nary a whisper. Yet during the year, Fuller played a key role and looks to be a core defensive piece while Lewis remains a huge question mark.

I think two things I have read about the Rams' draft that are absolutely false are: (1) The Rams "panicked" and (2) We miss Brad Holmes. The Rams, like every other team, run through hundreds of simulations and mock scenarios in the weeks leading up to the draft. I assure you that they were not "caught off guard" by any preceding pick and "panicked into picking a player." That's just now how all of this works. As for Brad Holmes role, he was part of a team that used the same scouts who picked last year's players that also scouted this year's players. He does not change the philosophy of Sean McVay or Raheem Morris.

I think the one thing I can take issue with is that the Rams appear to know who they are going to take before the draft begins. At least the first two picks hinted that they expected the Rams to pick them. I wonder if this is a product of managing the resources of the team, but it is worrisome that this doesn't account for falling players with exceptional value. But that merely goes back to the concept of perceived "value", something the Rams appear not to care about at all.

Isiah 58

I got roped into a fantasy basketball league many years ago and have played every year since.

Here's how it works. Yahoo, or whoever runs the league, rates the players. Presumably it's based on previous performance and projected stats. The algorithm can only guess. They can't predict injuries, how players who change teams will be affected by a new system, or even age.

IF you draft their highest ranking player every time your pick comes around, they will give you an A+ when they rank your draft. If you pick up someone earlier than their rankings have him rated and pass on a more highly ranked player that is "falling", you get a bad grade.

That's pretty much how it works in the media. They rank their players. Or use someone else's list. When a team picks the highest rated player, particularly if the pick reflects an area of perceived need, the team gets a high grade. If not, they get a low grade.

The thing I never understood was a "reach" pick. Let's say a team has the 10th pick in every round. They have a player they really like and really want, but he's the 25th ranked player in that round. They can't trade back so they either pick a guy who is a reach, or lose him completely as he won't be there the next time they pick.

By the way, in our fantasy basketball league, whoever has the highest ranked draft never wins the league.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Everyone Reading This Could Get an "A" Draft Grade Post-Draft

LBRamsFan288May 03, 2021 07:54AM

  I completely agree

Ramadune165May 03, 2021 08:48AM