Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: here's much needed proper context...

February 01, 2021 08:20AM
Quote
LMU93
Well, I'll say this. Are some of his pure stats "padded" from garbage time games/losses? Of course.

But as for the ESPN QBR the article points out (which adjusts for strength of defenses, situations, other context, etc.)? The last 5 years he's been rated 8th, 8th, 23rd, 6th and 15th. (Avg ranking: 12th)

Similarly, with Football Outsiders his past 5 years he has been 9th, 10th, 20th, 9th and 14th. (Avg: 12.4)

And PFF- 8th in 2016, 12th in 2017, 16th in 2018, 8th in 2019, and 14th in 2020. (Avg: 11.6)

Did the Rams acquire a top 5-6 QB? Absolutely not. Did they acquire a top-12 QB? Yes, they did.

Good analysis.

We're going to see what happens when you go from a top 20-25 QB to a top 12 one. One expert felt that Stafford was a top 10 QB and by pairing him with McVay we would see top 5 production.

Hope this is the case. We saw McVay make Goff look better than he is in 2017/2018.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Article: On Stafford - warning, not flattering

Ram49301February 01, 2021 07:52AM

  Re: Article: On Stafford - warning, not flattering

Rams43155February 01, 2021 08:04AM

  Can’t get enough childish name calling... nm

Atlantic Ram120February 01, 2021 08:21AM

  here's much needed proper context...

LMU93167February 01, 2021 08:09AM

  Re: here's much needed proper context...

dzrams133February 01, 2021 08:20AM

  Pressure is on McVay

CROMWELL21127February 01, 2021 08:23AM

  Re: here's much needed proper context...

Atlantic Ram119February 01, 2021 08:24AM

  Re: Article: On Stafford - warning, not flattering

roman18131February 01, 2021 08:17AM

  Well, hopefully stats aren't everything..

sstrams124February 01, 2021 08:19AM

  and even on 'pure stats'

LMU9397February 01, 2021 08:33AM