Re: nah
|
|
Quote
Speed_Kills
you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater
the rating for Ramsey is absurd... but as has been explained in the thread and in other threads. His rating was so low because they literally didn't throw at him and the rankings are based on targets and passes defended
So he literally did not have enough data collected to measure how well he played. The reason DW is rated so high is because that was not the case with him. He was targeted and had several breakups and two ints.
I have the feeling you want to throw them out because of Goff is ranked so low in them... but feel better he had a good ranking this week
I know 43 is a bit slow to get it but surprised you missed it
Haha...nope, they've always had those type of absurd ratings going back years now....like I said, they need to reasses their ratings if they're giving Ramsey a 55.5 after basically erasing Seahawks main weapon
They actually have Goff pretty high this year, has nothing to do with that....sorry to say
[www.instagram.com]
