Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Pick #57

April 16, 2020 10:28AM
Quote
Ekern55
I’ve been obsessed with running the draft simulator that has been kindly posted.

Rams can get value trading #52.

Trying to trade #57 on those simulations is more of a challenge. I either get declined (it’s all right. I’m used to it), or the return puts you back offers of trades in the 100th pick range.

Anyone finding better results?

Which site are you using?

I don't believe the draft simulators are very good at handling trades. First-pick's trades are wildly unrealistic in projecting what other teams would be wiling to give up. The Draft Network's simulator is too stringent in that almost no teams are willing to trade and those that are need way more than what the trade chart shows is comparable. E.g. they'll let me trade back from 57 to 72 for an additional 6th round pick when on the trade chart it should be closer to a very late 3rd.

In real life, I'm sure the Rams will have a trade down option if they want one. Snead says almost every year, the phones are always ringing.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Pick #57

Ekern55607April 16, 2020 09:10AM

  Re: Pick #57

Rampage2K-250April 16, 2020 10:20AM

  Re: Pick #57

Ekern55195April 16, 2020 11:16AM

  Re: Pick #57

dzrams200April 16, 2020 10:28AM

  Re: Pick #57

Ekern55167April 16, 2020 11:24AM

  Re: Pick #57

dzrams151April 16, 2020 11:47AM

  Re: Pick #57

Classicalwit129April 16, 2020 05:59PM

  Re: Pick #57

Ekern55149April 16, 2020 08:16PM