Were all of the losses really on the QB? Probably not. How could they be? But yet we get the same rhetoric from shock jocks. I'll bet you this: if you let Sean McVay watch everyone of those games, I'll guarantee that he would find myriad reasons for those losses and they wouldn't all be because of Kirk Cousins. Why do you suppose that is?
I guess we just disagree on this. It's fine but I'm not about to believe that most of these analysts or radio honks know what they are talking about. Most of them have no freaking clue.
