it's because he has given up zero sacks

Quote
CraigMatson
Did see him push a guy wide once I think they have another offensive lineman over there who's also bad so it not all Robinson who getting beat.

Maybe on the stats they aren't counting a stunt against him ?.
Is there a possibility that where he's set is close enough to another OL where they are charged for the negative play?.
Seems the logical answer besides in some direction indirection he actually riding his responsibility ok .

Trying to invent outlandish reasons for it won't work. He has given up zero sacks because he has given up zero sacks.

What that says is obvious. He has improved since his Rams days. It took him 6 years but he did.

Obviously he's not an all-pro but he has worked his way into being a solid pass blocker.

That makes a lot more sense than any cockamamie effort to invent reasons professional league statisticians would have somehow missed the sacks he gave up and attributed them to another guy.

I mean. Jeesh.