He's just stuck behind 3 great WRs...and this is his last year.
I'm sure we'll keep him for great depth & possible injuries like last year...it's a wise thing to do.
But it's his last year and we won't re-sign him - so we're renting him one more year - whici is fine.
Just sayin the Pats kinda do that thing where they trade a player 1yr too early as opposed to 1yr too late...and get a good return.
I was just thinkin IF they wanted to build draft capital for next year...getting a high draft pick for Reynolds would be good...
and trading him would allow him to have a career in the NFL where he gets more action.
However, the Rams FO seems to dig the one year rental concept just to get to the big game...
even if it might cost the future a little bit.
I LOVE Reynolds and want to keep him...hell,
I wanna run 4 WRs on offense instead of going more 2 TE personnel sets...
so, I'm the last guy to ask!!! lol
"L'audace, l'audace. Toujours l'audace!"