February 03, 2019 08:50PM
Woods and Kupp, and 50% of that got hurt, yes I know Reynolds has all the tolos and I am willing to give him a chance (I actually have no choice) But if he can develop some cojones he could be a big time receiver he just let me down too often this year. Cooks would be great on an Edelman's role but we need a big confident and reliable receiver, where was Woods when we needed him? He did have a phantom catch but other tan that I don't remember him doing much, anyone care to enblighten me?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

chunkmeister453February 03, 2019 07:23PM

  He is NOT a #1 WR

Ram49270February 03, 2019 07:24PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

zn271February 03, 2019 07:25PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

maserati235February 03, 2019 07:31PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

reggae190February 03, 2019 07:42PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

badgerdms202February 03, 2019 08:46PM

  We have two receivers that can go get contested balls

mexram233February 03, 2019 08:50PM

  True, and probably would against mortals... but not the Pats...

JamesJM177February 03, 2019 08:55PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

joram181February 04, 2019 02:32AM

  I don't think he has the size to do that consistently. nm

Ramgator154February 04, 2019 02:35AM