February 03, 2019 07:42PM
He was interfered with. Not blatant. But kept him from getting 2 hands on the ball. Was a good effort. A great throw. But can't fault him for that. We needed Kupp this game
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

chunkmeister455February 03, 2019 07:23PM

  He is NOT a #1 WR

Ram49271February 03, 2019 07:24PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

zn271February 03, 2019 07:25PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

maserati236February 03, 2019 07:31PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

reggae190February 03, 2019 07:42PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

badgerdms203February 03, 2019 08:46PM

  We have two receivers that can go get contested balls

mexram235February 03, 2019 08:50PM

  True, and probably would against mortals... but not the Pats...

JamesJM178February 03, 2019 08:55PM

  Re: Cooks is a solid received....but he HAS to make those contested receptions

joram181February 04, 2019 02:32AM

  I don't think he has the size to do that consistently. nm

Ramgator154February 04, 2019 02:35AM