Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Because it's great for a fast straight start, but not for side to side

December 08, 2018 06:17AM
Frankly, looking back, it was not helpful to start a WR in a 3 point stance.
It is good if a) there is a need to keep pad level low for leverage, or b) if you want to go straight ahead in the fastest start.
But, if you are being press covered, or closely covered, you can't move laterally as quickly. And what if it's a reverse? Or a screen? It slows down the process.

A 3 pt. stance for a WR is a disadvantage to the Receiver......at least in the modern game.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Does anyone remember when....?

NewMexicoRam558December 07, 2018 05:19PM

  Re: Does anyone remember when....?

stlramz399December 07, 2018 05:32PM

  Re: Does anyone remember when....?

Coy Bacon278December 07, 2018 05:44PM

  Re: Does anyone remember when....?

Ekern55240December 07, 2018 07:11PM

  Question is why don't they do it now?

JamesJM263December 07, 2018 07:48PM

  Good point. They all do it for their 40 meter times at the combine

chunkmeister171December 08, 2018 05:58AM

  Because it's great for a fast straight start, but not for side to side

RockRam154December 08, 2018 06:17AM

  That makes some sense...

JamesJM133December 08, 2018 07:44AM

  Re: Question is why don't they do it now?

Coy Bacon262December 08, 2018 07:51AM

  Which brings up...

JamesJM137December 08, 2018 07:53AM

  Good question that made me think about it.

Ramgator176December 08, 2018 05:05AM