agree taking reports at face value is filled with pot holes
however, there was the ESPN Mexico city reporter came on San Diego radio for an extended time yesterday. There was clearly knowledge of the field being used extensively for events during the last number of months.
As an official rep involved said on another broadcast, they needed to "amortize" their need to recoup revenue, but needed to acknowledge that would lead to deterioration of conditions.
Whether the NFL closely monitored the field during the time is up for discussion, but that they were oblivious to the safety concerns on multiple levels over the last number of weeks? Would seem false, too?
