October 15, 2018 05:46AM
See the thing is, Goff is more Rothlesberger than Bradford or Alex Smith.
Goff moves around, hangs in there, and does not like to throw check downs. He wants to push the ball downfield; he looks for explosive plays. And that means taking chances and holding on to the ball longer than the manual says you should, etc.

Bradford and Smith on the other hand are true check-down Charleys. They want to get the ball out quick, throw only high percentage throws, and indeed this looks great in the stats, keeps the sacks low, but also doesn't usually get the team very far.....especially come playoff time.

Every QB has a style, and every style has advantages and draw backs. And that style is absolutely innate....instinctive....reflects the personality. It cannot be taught and later changed to something else. Rothlesberger is what he is. Goff is what he is. Cam Newton is what he is, etc. Goff will always have a moderate amount of sacks; not the lowest, but never the highest. Like Rothlesberger. And Goff will always have pretty high YPC, YPA, etc.

I like it. No....I LOVE it. This is offensive football that is fun to watch! And with the rules as they now are, it is winning football.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Quick O line comment (good)

Steve625October 15, 2018 03:51AM

  Re: Quick O line comment (good)

SoCalRAMatic194October 15, 2018 04:56AM

  In realtime I was thinking it was on Goff

EternalHorns170October 15, 2018 05:30AM

  Well, which do you want: Bradford, Jr. or Rothlesberger, Jr.?

RockRam178October 15, 2018 05:46AM

  Re: Well, which do you want: 100% agree with you

Steve102October 15, 2018 06:00AM

  Re: Well, which do you want: Bradford, Jr. or Rothlesberger, Jr.?

kfriel82October 15, 2018 06:13AM

  Re: Well, which do you want: Bradford, Jr. or Rothlesberger, Jr.?

SoCalRAMatic70October 15, 2018 06:40AM

  Re: Well, which do you want: Bradford, Jr. or Rothlesberger, Jr.?

kfriel67October 15, 2018 06:50AM

  Spectrum not ends of a pendulum

moklerman77October 15, 2018 06:57AM

  It was all about Denvers strategy

max236October 15, 2018 05:39AM

  I don't totally agree with you, but for the sake of argument...

EternalHorns171October 15, 2018 05:45AM

  Don't get me wrong, I think we did great

max166October 15, 2018 05:53AM

  Expect others to copy it

chunkmeister144October 15, 2018 05:51AM

  +1. Totally agree

max87October 15, 2018 05:56AM

  Denver couldnt hang in a shootout either

Hazlet Hacksaw109October 15, 2018 06:08AM

  Re: copy it? lol c'mon guys

Speed_Kills83October 15, 2018 07:08AM

  Re: It's pick your poison tbh

merlin75October 15, 2018 08:29AM

  Re: Yes but again

Speed_Kills74October 15, 2018 04:07PM

  I think impatient is a fair word.

Saguaro61October 15, 2018 04:10PM

  I agree with that, yessir

NewMexicoRam146October 15, 2018 08:48AM

  Re: It was all about Denvers strategy

moklerman95October 15, 2018 07:04AM

  Re: It was all about Denvers strategy

moklerman65October 15, 2018 07:16AM

  Thats for this year.

max129October 15, 2018 08:00AM

  Re: Thats for this year.

moklerman150October 15, 2018 08:03AM

  Huh?

max69October 15, 2018 08:55AM

  excellent post Max

Speed_Kills96October 15, 2018 07:06AM

  thanks Speed. nm

max77October 15, 2018 07:14AM

  Re: Recall the Rams recent losses to the Redskins

Speed_Kills91October 15, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: Quick O line comment (good)

Rampage2K-104October 15, 2018 07:03AM