Like swinging a bat with weights. Fisher made it so difficult to be successful. So you takes the weights off and the bat seems easier to swing.

On the other hand, it is surprising. Even with the numbers and wins it doesn't seem that he should make that list. But then, perhaps production is all that matters. I am happy for him.

Funny how a fan base can label a player as "not good" based on lack of production and then label him as "good" when that player produces... Is it the player who changed? Or did he just not produce in the scheme?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/22/2018 08:42PM by Atlantic Ram.