March 18, 2018 11:10AM
Quote
RockRam
I'm not a PFF groupie. I take their analytics with a grain of salt. As ALL analytics should be taken.
They are numbers, often without sufficient context.
.

Except with Watkins. And of course, KC and the other teams willing to play him were idiots with big egos who didn't understand Watkins was "fourth on this own team in productivity?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Just got a text from a player personnel director: 'PFF is fake as f---'

Blue and Gold965March 17, 2018 06:18PM

  Pretty much feel the same way

Speedball89363March 17, 2018 07:06PM

  Perfect Example

droopy376March 17, 2018 07:36PM

  Re: Perfect Example

Speedball89296March 17, 2018 07:43PM

  Re: Perfect Example

Steve253March 17, 2018 08:53PM

  Re: Perfect Example

cool_hand_luke314March 17, 2018 09:02PM

  well said (nm)

zn208March 17, 2018 09:45PM

  Re: Perfect Example..great post!

BumRap305March 17, 2018 10:30PM

  100% right

Blue and Gold205March 17, 2018 11:29PM

  Re: Not a Perfect Example

dzrams322March 18, 2018 06:19AM

  Uh oh...

jemach244March 18, 2018 06:46AM

  Some NFL executives just don't think anyone but they can judge players

RockRam255March 18, 2018 02:21AM

  Re: Some NFL executives just don't think anyone but they can judge players

9-99188March 18, 2018 06:22AM

  So context matters with numbers?

Blue and Gold336March 18, 2018 11:10AM