Quote
Rams43
Does the Peters trade take CB at #23 off the table, now?
I don’t think so, necessarily.
Depends on BPA at LOT, CB, Edge, or NT, of course.
But if a CB that they really like should fall, it would still make a ton of sense.
Peters will take away half the field, virtually. But if the other outside CB is weak, then the QB could still feast on him. However, if the rookie (or maybe a second tier FA) could also hold his own, then the QB is in a fix. Even a Brady or a Brees. What an exquisite scenario for Wade.
Another thing. What if Peters doesn’t work out? Too much of a distraction? It would be very nice to have a quality young 2 year vet already in place at the “other” CB spot, huh?
Don’t get me wrong. I’m just fine with a NT, Edge, or LOT, too. Just daydreaming here a little bit. Lol.
I agree.....nothing wrong with having TWO outstanding CB's at cheap rookie contracts
If the highest rated player on their board is a CB, draft him!!!
I have a feeling they might be trading down to compensate for the 3rd they prolly gave up for Peters.
[
www.instagram.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/24/2018 12:27PM by Rampage2K-.
