Quote
GarlicExile
And you could say the Pats defense did better than that awful Vikings defense, who allowed 38 points to Foles Eagles

was all over media Super Bowl week and in the telecast. It wasn't a complex offense, it was full of RPOs, and ROs, one read, throw the ball. They executed it beautifully. The used plays Foles was comfortable with and good at and that is the Chip Kelly-type stuff. When Foles was doing that in 2013 he had 27 TDs and 2 picks and a passer rating of 119. It wasn't all Chip Kelly plays, but many, many were and they worked like it was 2013, and that is what happened to Vikings, too.

Simple stuff works against good defenses if you executing it well. But the WCO Wentz ran was more complex, not "primitive" as you suggested. The more primitive (not a word I like, but you used it) offense of the two is the one they had Foles use versus the full offense of Wentz.