Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Blinkscout Game 10, Vikings ...

November 22, 2017 01:56PM
Nice list, Alyo.

Yeah, I hope and pray that they can find some OLB and CB help next offseason. Even at the expense of postponing a Whit replacement for another year.

A promising NT later would be nice, too.

Would you favor extending TruJo for, say, $12 million per? Or would you just prefer to move on with a draft pick and keep starting Webster? Myself. I would prefer extending TruJo (but for no more than $12 million) and eliminating a big hole to fill.

Even so, I would like to take a CB high to eventually replace Webster. I think of Webster as a placeholder. You?

Think we should extend Watkins? Or, like me, do you want to see more evidence that he’s the answer as a #1 WR? Is it a scheming problem, a Goff problem, or a Watkins problem? I’ve read all 3 theories advanced. Funny that Woods has thrived with Goff/McVay and Watkins hasn’t, huh?

I expect that we’ll be picking somewhere in the twenties. I further expect that this will be an extremely heavy draft on D. Hopefully, this draft will be rich in positions of need for the Rams.

Quite a few moving parts for the Rams next offseason.

If S&M play their offseason cards well, the Rams could be a very balanced and dangerous team in ‘18.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Blinkscout Game 10, Vikings ...

alyoshamucci531November 22, 2017 11:40AM

  Re: Blinkscout Game 10, Vikings ...

Rams43254November 22, 2017 01:56PM

  I'd be happier extending Tru.

alyoshamucci210November 22, 2017 03:08PM

  Re: I'd be happier extending Tru.

Glyndwr71231November 23, 2017 04:55AM

  Re: I'd be happier extending Tru.

21Dog232November 23, 2017 06:55AM

  Re: Blinkscout Game 10, Vikings ...

Steve217November 22, 2017 08:01PM

  Re: Blinkscout Game 10, Vikings ...

leafnose228November 23, 2017 05:01AM