Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Disagree.....

October 09, 2017 12:10PM
I agree that Gurley lost possession of the ball before he stepped out of bounds. In other words: I agree that Gurley was no longer "in control" of the ball when he stepped out of bounds.

HOWEVER-- was he still IN CONTACT with the ball WHILE his foot was out of bounds?

According to the 2017 NFL rulebook:

Item 2: Loose Ball. A loose ball is out of bounds when it touches a boundary line or anything that is on or outside such line, including a player, an official, or a pylon.

The key word here is "Touches." To me, sounds like a "loose ball" (which this was) is considered out of bounds immediately when it touches a player who is out of bounds.

Again, I'm not 100% certain on this, but the wording of the rulebook would seem to suggest that the final call was incorrect.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Photo of Bad Call Part Two Attachments

XXXIVwin762October 09, 2017 09:28AM

  it's clear the refs blew that call.....

Rampage2K-309October 09, 2017 09:38AM

  Re: it's clear the refs blew that call.....

XXXIVwin302October 09, 2017 09:42AM

  IF he is touching the ball

NewMexicoRam323October 09, 2017 09:54AM

  Re: IF he is touching the ball

Rampage2K-289October 09, 2017 10:00AM

  I don't see that they had much choice

NewMexicoRam290October 09, 2017 10:08AM

  Disagree.....

HighPlainsDrifter292October 09, 2017 11:38AM

  Re: Disagree.....

ram99252October 09, 2017 11:52AM

  Re: Disagree.....

XXXIVwin276October 09, 2017 12:10PM

  Re: Disagree.....

Anonymous User242October 09, 2017 12:13PM

  I see your point.....

HighPlainsDrifter294October 09, 2017 12:23PM

  Doesn’t need to be in control.

TulareRam315October 09, 2017 12:12PM

  It's just I don't think the TV images prove contact with the ball

NewMexicoRam267October 09, 2017 01:17PM

  Re: It's just I don't think the TV images prove contact with the ball

XXXIVwin256October 09, 2017 02:36PM