Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: agree completely

October 02, 2017 09:28AM
The rest advantage might have been huge as someone else I think mentioned in having Sullivan Tavon and Watkins up yes.
However I also think we made some adjustments in game and had a good gameplan and enough talent to fight Dallas on that minus Sullivan probably.
Glad we had him of course.
I think I heard some. Numbers from a betting service though.
Stats on team coming off a Monday night game playing a team playing a Thursday night game 10 days before.
It is almost 50-50 result.
So betting line at Dallas favoured by what 8 ?
Off by maybe 4~5 pts and a bad bet as it was at 8 ?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  One year later, Goff is better than Dak---from Dallas writer

Steve756October 02, 2017 08:20AM

  Re: One year later, Goff is better than Dak---from Dallas writer

CraigMatson300October 02, 2017 08:49AM

  In *fairness* to Dallas...

Suh-weet!299October 02, 2017 09:02AM

  agree completely

LMU93278October 02, 2017 09:04AM

  Re: agree completely

CraigMatson301October 02, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: In *fairness* to Dallas...

Steve185October 02, 2017 09:55AM

  Re: In *fairness* to Dallas...

Rampage2K-229October 02, 2017 10:03AM

  I also don't get the sense Watkins was 100%, either

The_Bad_Guy187October 02, 2017 11:40AM

  Also missing Anthony Hitchens...

jemach191October 02, 2017 10:12AM

  Yeah but...

headslapper222October 02, 2017 11:49AM

  Dak and Goff are both good.

NewMexicoRam253October 02, 2017 09:19AM

  Dak: Looks Like Steve McNair

Ram49211October 02, 2017 10:00AM