The Bleacher Report is the National Enquirer of Sports Magazines.
The instant it spoke of Goff's terrible inaccuracy during his time at Cal is just so off the charts opposite of truth that it is pointless to continue reading an article that is based on that premise.
In fact it was a bit of a concern for Wentz, not Goff, that inaccuracy was becoming a problem. Goff was very accurate in college. He was a 60% passer as a freshman. A 62% passer as a sophmore. And a nearly 65% passer as a junior. You can't do that if you are inaccurate. And his was not a dink and dunk offense.
For Wentz, his accuracy decreased every year he played. He began at 75% as a freshman and it decreased yearly until his senior year at 62%. Certainly not terrible accuracy, but alarming that the older he got and the more he played the less accurate he became. Don't get me wrong; his stats were still good. But we see the trajectories of both and one is up and the other is down. And BTW, I like Wentz so this isn't meant as a shot but rather as a comparison for the sake of example.
