August 12, 2017 11:15AM
And the reason it's impossible to say is that Snead never gave any indication he wasn't all in on the GRob pick.

We all know Fisher hired Snead to effectively do his bidding, but my view on Snead's culpability is very simple. He is culpable for all of it since he both accepted the gig, and thereby the responsibility, and he promoted everything they were doing with full force and vigor.

At the end of the day you end up arguing whether Snead is a bad GM or an unadulterated Yes Man, which effectively becomes a distinction without a difference.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Does the Watkins trade hint that GRob was not on Snead?

max496August 12, 2017 06:52AM

  That didn't occur to me

PHDram215August 12, 2017 07:06AM

  Re: That didn't occur to me

zn179August 12, 2017 07:24AM

  Yup...

max120August 12, 2017 10:49AM

  It's impossible to say without being there

9er8er112August 12, 2017 11:15AM

  Re: It's impossible to say without being there

zn118August 12, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: It's impossible to say without being there

9er8er131August 12, 2017 01:20PM

  You better be careful

PHDram113August 12, 2017 01:16PM

  A correct but nuanced reading

RFL113August 12, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: A correct but nuanced reading

zn120August 12, 2017 11:19AM