August 12, 2017 10:49AM
The idea that everybody agrees on every pick is absurd. It defies logic.

Think about how ridiculous it would be that if everyone didn't agree on the pick then they would not pick the guy...

Picture this... The FO and HC can't agree on either Wentz or Goff, so they take neither cause they can't get total agreement on either guy. And then they don't have a QB.

How about this simple answer. Fisher wanted GRob for his grunt run game system, and Snead who rated Watkins a bit higher deferred to Fisher who had final say rather then not taking either of them.



~ max ~
“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Does the Watkins trade hint that GRob was not on Snead?

max493August 12, 2017 06:52AM

  That didn't occur to me

PHDram213August 12, 2017 07:06AM

  Re: That didn't occur to me

zn177August 12, 2017 07:24AM

  Yup...

max119August 12, 2017 10:49AM

  It's impossible to say without being there

9er8er111August 12, 2017 11:15AM

  Re: It's impossible to say without being there

zn116August 12, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: It's impossible to say without being there

9er8er129August 12, 2017 01:20PM

  You better be careful

PHDram112August 12, 2017 01:16PM

  A correct but nuanced reading

RFL111August 12, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: A correct but nuanced reading

zn118August 12, 2017 11:19AM