I agree with you that he was a good RB and returner but nothing special. Would have preferred to keep him but not a London Fletcher type loss... not even a Hedgecock type of loss.
Wouldn't vastly overrated mean that he is being considered a starter or something? Are there people really saying that? All I hear is people saying that he was a solid player. So if there are a few people saying he is the next Faulk then I stand corrected. Otherwise I think a "little" overrated by even the most extreme pov's is the most I've seen.
