Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
LMU93
May 22, 2017 05:36PM
Both big losses but to me the difference is Holohan was 31 and didn't do much after leaving the Rams. Fletcher was 26 and went on to 11 more very good seasons. He should never ever have been allowed to leave. That was a huge leadership void on defense.
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Bigger loss to Rams...Pete Holohan or London Fletcher??

Ramgator574May 22, 2017 03:01PM

  Re: Great question......Pete Holohan.

oldschoolramfan206May 22, 2017 03:54PM

  I do not think of the GSOT as a flash in the pan....

JamesJM201May 22, 2017 03:59PM

  Mike's ego killed the GSOT

Rampage2K-308May 22, 2017 04:05PM

  Be that as it may...

JamesJM259May 22, 2017 04:08PM

  Re: Be that as it may...

Rampage2K-222May 22, 2017 04:16PM

  Thing is, Vermeil did not stay and...

Ramgator194May 23, 2017 06:47AM

  Martz would have been hired as a HC

PeoriaRa191May 23, 2017 07:08AM

  Fletcher, easily

six2stack170May 23, 2017 07:50AM

  Re: Mike's ego killed the GSOT

Ramdom191May 23, 2017 09:58AM

  Re: Bigger loss to Rams...Pete Holohan or London Fletcher??

LMU93315May 22, 2017 05:36PM

  Played at a HOF level

ferragamo79217May 22, 2017 08:03PM

  But the overall , long term impact was bigger with Holohan.

Ramgator161May 23, 2017 06:49AM

  Fletcher

PeoriaRa283May 23, 2017 09:54AM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages