Seriously, though. This whole wave of internet numbskulls over the past 10 years is tantamount to a bunch of fans. Poor research and writing is further manifest in articles like these. Just because you can write something doesn't mean that you should. Both Wentz and Goff are too young to be making these kinds of assessments. Had this writer been properly educated, or educated at all for that matter, he would have reasoned that the sample size is too small for both players, and he would have chosen to write something else or, better, nothing at all.
