May 15, 2017 03:25PM
I've seen research posted somewhere that historically Philips has not had highly paid ILBs. They have usually been inexpensive late round draftees. I haven't researched that myself but if it's true there's a good reason why not.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams see LB Mark Barron 'fitting in' to new system

RamBill995May 15, 2017 04:34AM

  Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

RamBill449May 15, 2017 04:47AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

canuckramsfans352May 15, 2017 07:44AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

oldschoolramfan300May 15, 2017 10:04AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

tonyde326May 15, 2017 10:19AM

  why not?

zn310May 15, 2017 11:11AM

  Re: why not?

TonyHunter87307May 15, 2017 03:08PM

  Re: why not?

zn257May 15, 2017 04:48PM

  Re: one possible reason why not

dzrams260May 15, 2017 03:25PM

  Re: why not?

tonyde337May 15, 2017 03:57PM

  Re: why not?

zn306May 15, 2017 04:55PM

  so we dont want a lb

PHDram276May 15, 2017 01:06PM

  for 2017 I believe it

LMU93314May 15, 2017 10:37AM

  Barron is a good player

snowman395May 15, 2017 01:01PM

  Broncos ILBs under Phillips

zn349May 15, 2017 04:52PM