Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn

April 17, 2017 06:13AM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 1,603
Status: GSOT Member

I'd move some of those players around. They have Hooker in the bottom 25 but in mock drafts he never gets out of the top 10.

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	RamBill	1125	April 16, 2017 04:38PM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	dzrams	683	April 16, 2017 08:34PM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	zn	254	April 17, 2017 02:26AM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	leafnose	247	April 17, 2017 05:03AM
Disagree. I think they could do D at 37	RockRam	253	April 17, 2017 05:44AM
Re: Disagree. I think they could do D at 37	zn	206	April 17, 2017 05:57AM
Meant to respond to DZ, but I misread his post (nm).	RockRam	243	April 17, 2017 06:01AM
They could do ANYTHING...	max	236	April 17, 2017 06:01AM
impact player	LMU93	197	April 17, 2017 07:08AM
Re: impact player	max	539	April 17, 2017 07:37AM
Re: impact player	LMU93	175	April 17, 2017 08:34AM
Depends on Definition of "Impact Players"	RamBill	255	April 17, 2017 08:55AM
Re: Depends on Definition of "Impact Players"	LMU93	198	April 17, 2017 09:28AM
then we need a standard	zn	192	April 17, 2017 11:12AM
I think there's a different standard for every team	PARAM	179	April 17, 2017 12:38PM
yes but given that	zn	205	April 17, 2017 01:42PM
Personally, IMHO	PARAM	246	April 17, 2017 02:24PM
Re: impact player	max	223	April 17, 2017 11:41AM
I agree with you	Ram49	267	April 17, 2017 03:30PM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	The Professor	246	April 17, 2017 06:13AM
This on Mahomes	9er8er	326	April 17, 2017 05:57PM