Meant to respond to DZ, but I misread his post (nm).

April 17, 2017 06:01AM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 10,495
Status: HOF Inductee

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	RamBill	1126	April 16, 2017 04:38PM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	dzrams	683	April 16, 2017 08:34PM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	zn	255	April 17, 2017 02:26AM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	leafnose	248	April 17, 2017 05:03AM
Disagree. I think they could do D at 37	RockRam	254	April 17, 2017 05:44AM
Re: Disagree. I think they could do D at 37	zn	207	April 17, 2017 05:57AM
Meant to respond to DZ, but I misread his post (nm).	RockRam	244	April 17, 2017 06:01AM
They could do ANYTHING...	max	237	April 17, 2017 06:01AM
impact player	LMU93	198	April 17, 2017 07:08AM
Re: impact player	max	539	April 17, 2017 07:37AM
Re: impact player	LMU93	176	April 17, 2017 08:34AM
Depends on Definition of "Impact Players"	RamBill	256	April 17, 2017 08:55AM
Re: Depends on Definition of "Impact Players"	LMU93	199	April 17, 2017 09:28AM
then we need a standard	zn	193	April 17, 2017 11:12AM
I think there's a different standard for every team	PARAM	180	April 17, 2017 12:38PM
yes but given that	zn	206	April 17, 2017 01:42PM
Personally, IMHO	PARAM	247	April 17, 2017 02:24PM
Re: impact player	max	224	April 17, 2017 11:41AM
I agree with you	Ram49	268	April 17, 2017 03:30PM
Re: 2017 NFL Draft Outlook Based on NFL Personnel Executives/ McGinn	The Professor	248	April 17, 2017 06:13AM
This on Mahomes	9er8er	327	April 17, 2017 05:57PM