Quote
PHDram
i have no problem if it goes like that however i disagree with your premise.
1. im not sure there are MUCH better players. there seems to be a long jam of talent from late 1 to mid 2 and i frequently see feeny and lamp in that mix.
2. imo its imperative to adress the line before the wr. a great wr does no good if goff cant get him the ball. i know a center is not sexy but who who cares.
3. by most account feeny and lamp are better than roullier.
4. while sullivan may rebound and play well, im not sure we should bank on that. he lasted in fa because there are questions about him at this point in his career.
Quote
Rams43
Quote
PHDram
I think they are thinking of taking lamp or feeney in the second to fill the center spot.
You may be right, PHD.
But I, for one, would be disappointed if they did. Particularly Feeney.
Other talented players at positions of much bigger need will be sitting there for us.
I'd much prefer Roulier in the 5th backing up Sullivan, allowing us to take a primo TE, WR, or CB at #37. Perhaps a stud DE/Edge, LB, or S that somehow fell in our laps (like Donald did in '14)
We just see the value/need at #37 for the Rams a bit differently, PHD.
I see your point. It's logical to me.
I just prefer my take a bit more. It's cool.
