March 10, 2017 09:30AM
Pryor is risky. New at the position. One good year. I'd like to have him but I'll bet he costs as much or more than Garcon.

Bennett not only adds to firepower, he is a terrific inline blocker from the TE position. He and Higbee would be a good 1-2 punch at TE.

And he'll probably be 60% of the cost of Pryor.

Rams need to go to the draft for any more WR's.

But, you never know if the right guy came along at the right price.

Clearly, cost is going to matter.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Pryor and / or Bennet?

promomasterj769March 10, 2017 09:19AM

  Bennett.

RockRam382March 10, 2017 09:30AM

  Pryor No Contest

den-the-coach328March 10, 2017 09:33AM

  Pryor....no question.

Rampage2K-260March 10, 2017 09:37AM

  Re: Pryor....might be able to be had right now.

Rampage2K-270March 10, 2017 10:14AM

  I'll take either

ferragamo79264March 10, 2017 10:15AM

  Terrelle Pryor signs a 1-year, $8M deal with Washington, per @ProFootballTalk

Blue and Gold278March 10, 2017 11:02AM

  Re: Terrelle Pryor signs a 1-year, $8M deal with Washington, per @ProFootballTalk

Saban23273March 10, 2017 11:15AM

  Looks like Bennet is gone too

promomasterj232March 10, 2017 04:06PM