September 25, 2016 12:01AM
Quote
zn
Quote
BumRap
How many starts did he have so we can't project logically in Keenum's favor. Davis put up some nice numbers over his short starting career. Did not help him when he struggled.

In his last 3 starts Davis looked and acted lost. Plus of course Davis played zero games before his first 2014 start. In contrast, this season combined with the previous 2, Keenum has started 9 games. His team won 6 of those 9. Davis had nothing like that on his resume before he was benched. With Keenum, in contrast, you can assume he will return to a former, better level of play---one which he showed in his games in 2 seasons before this one.

What better "level" of play are you referring to? I don't see anywhere in his career where he's even strung together 4 games of consistent play. His first 3 games that he started are pretty much the best "level" he's ever reached.

In his Rams career(7 games) he's completed 56% of his passes for 6.0 ypa, 4TD/3INT and a 77.5 rating. I don't see why any team would pay for that kind of lack of production.





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/25/2016 12:05AM by moklerman.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

GreatRamNTheSky1052September 22, 2016 12:33PM

  I think you're probably right, Grits.

JamesJM470September 22, 2016 05:23PM

  Re: I think you're probably right, Grits.

David Deacon392September 23, 2016 02:12AM

  I don't think we can look at it that way.

RockRam435September 23, 2016 03:40AM

  Yeah, I agree with all that...

max458September 23, 2016 03:57AM

  Why get rid of Keenum

Hazlet Hacksaw391September 23, 2016 04:14AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

LMU93407September 23, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn384September 23, 2016 05:19AM

  I can see advantages both ways

LMU93399September 23, 2016 05:25AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

zn368September 23, 2016 05:31AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

LMU93359September 23, 2016 06:03AM

  I sure hope Mannion is the plan

moklerman369September 24, 2016 02:11AM

  Yes, the money matters.

RockRam358September 23, 2016 03:56PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams399September 23, 2016 03:40PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn345September 23, 2016 05:05PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams277September 23, 2016 11:46PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn386September 24, 2016 04:10AM

  Re: We did not stick with Davis

BumRap331September 24, 2016 07:14PM

  after 3 consecutive complete collapse games

zn362September 24, 2016 08:27PM

  What are we to assume?

moklerman350September 25, 2016 12:01AM

  Compare that to other backups

LesBaker303September 25, 2016 06:26AM

  +1

zn326September 25, 2016 07:28AM

  Re: Compare that to other backups

moklerman311September 25, 2016 08:18AM

  zn, you've resisted ascribing win rates to QBs

ArizonaRamFan337September 25, 2016 06:14AM

  and I still do

zn333September 25, 2016 07:17AM

  Davis could not make many of the throws

Rams_81403September 25, 2016 07:35AM

  I agree he is a keeper

LesBaker256September 24, 2016 04:38AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn305September 24, 2016 03:56PM

  No rush to get rid of Keenum but

Rams_81225September 25, 2016 07:38AM

  Re: No rush to get rid of Keenum but

zn312September 25, 2016 08:25AM

  Re: Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

SoCalRAMatic367September 23, 2016 05:02AM

  Now, Fisher isn't saying who #2 is for Tampa...

max377September 23, 2016 12:07PM

  Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

NewMexicoRam450September 24, 2016 01:06PM

  Re: Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

zn352September 24, 2016 01:19PM