Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
max
September 23, 2016 03:57AM
Quote
RockRam
Even when Goff gets elevated to #1, I don't think there is any limiting factor as to why Keenum couldn't be #2 the remainder of this year.
In fact, it would probably be better for Goff to have Keenum #2 because he'll be activated on game day and it would give him someone with NFL game experience to talk things over with.

I do think that after this year, assuming Goff doesn't completely flame out, that Keenum will be gone and our QB corp will be Goff and Mannion.

I do think Keenum is gone after this year if all goes according to plan.
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

GreatRamNTheSky1052September 22, 2016 12:33PM

  I think you're probably right, Grits.

JamesJM471September 22, 2016 05:23PM

  Re: I think you're probably right, Grits.

David Deacon393September 23, 2016 02:12AM

  I don't think we can look at it that way.

RockRam435September 23, 2016 03:40AM

  Yeah, I agree with all that...

max458September 23, 2016 03:57AM

  Why get rid of Keenum

Hazlet Hacksaw391September 23, 2016 04:14AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

LMU93407September 23, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn385September 23, 2016 05:19AM

  I can see advantages both ways

LMU93399September 23, 2016 05:25AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

zn368September 23, 2016 05:31AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

LMU93359September 23, 2016 06:03AM

  I sure hope Mannion is the plan

moklerman369September 24, 2016 02:11AM

  Yes, the money matters.

RockRam358September 23, 2016 03:56PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams399September 23, 2016 03:40PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn346September 23, 2016 05:05PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams277September 23, 2016 11:46PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn387September 24, 2016 04:10AM

  Re: We did not stick with Davis

BumRap331September 24, 2016 07:14PM

  after 3 consecutive complete collapse games

zn362September 24, 2016 08:27PM

  What are we to assume?

moklerman351September 25, 2016 12:01AM

  Compare that to other backups

LesBaker303September 25, 2016 06:26AM

  +1

zn327September 25, 2016 07:28AM

  Re: Compare that to other backups

moklerman311September 25, 2016 08:18AM

  zn, you've resisted ascribing win rates to QBs

ArizonaRamFan337September 25, 2016 06:14AM

  and I still do

zn334September 25, 2016 07:17AM

  Davis could not make many of the throws

Rams_81404September 25, 2016 07:35AM

  I agree he is a keeper

LesBaker256September 24, 2016 04:38AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn305September 24, 2016 03:56PM

  No rush to get rid of Keenum but

Rams_81226September 25, 2016 07:38AM

  Re: No rush to get rid of Keenum but

zn312September 25, 2016 08:25AM

  Re: Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

SoCalRAMatic368September 23, 2016 05:02AM

  Now, Fisher isn't saying who #2 is for Tampa...

max378September 23, 2016 12:07PM

  Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

NewMexicoRam451September 24, 2016 01:06PM

  Re: Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

zn352September 24, 2016 01:19PM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages