September 23, 2016 02:12AM
I think it is all about preparing Goff and while they like Mannion their focus in on preparing Goff to be the starter and he will grow and learn more as the number 2.

Keenum is there to see if they can win a few games before Goff takes over and the main goal is for Goff to be successful when he finally gets the start.

It would not surprise me if Keenum has issues in the next game or 2 or 3 that Goff relieves him and gets some time.

If Goff does well he will he will start or shows good promise he will finally take over.

Longer term Mannion will be the 2 and I do not expect them to pay Keenum 3 Mil + next year.

I think this is how Fisher saw things unfolding all the time and that he wants to keep the pressure off Goff as much as possible while helping him get acclimated to being a starting QB in the NFL.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

GreatRamNTheSky1055September 22, 2016 12:33PM

  I think you're probably right, Grits.

JamesJM473September 22, 2016 05:23PM

  Re: I think you're probably right, Grits.

David Deacon394September 23, 2016 02:12AM

  I don't think we can look at it that way.

RockRam436September 23, 2016 03:40AM

  Yeah, I agree with all that...

max460September 23, 2016 03:57AM

  Why get rid of Keenum

Hazlet Hacksaw394September 23, 2016 04:14AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

LMU93410September 23, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn386September 23, 2016 05:19AM

  I can see advantages both ways

LMU93401September 23, 2016 05:25AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

zn370September 23, 2016 05:31AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

LMU93361September 23, 2016 06:03AM

  I sure hope Mannion is the plan

moklerman371September 24, 2016 02:11AM

  Yes, the money matters.

RockRam360September 23, 2016 03:56PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams400September 23, 2016 03:40PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn347September 23, 2016 05:05PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams280September 23, 2016 11:46PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn389September 24, 2016 04:10AM

  Re: We did not stick with Davis

BumRap333September 24, 2016 07:14PM

  after 3 consecutive complete collapse games

zn364September 24, 2016 08:27PM

  What are we to assume?

moklerman351September 25, 2016 12:01AM

  Compare that to other backups

LesBaker305September 25, 2016 06:26AM

  +1

zn328September 25, 2016 07:28AM

  Re: Compare that to other backups

moklerman312September 25, 2016 08:18AM

  zn, you've resisted ascribing win rates to QBs

ArizonaRamFan339September 25, 2016 06:14AM

  and I still do

zn335September 25, 2016 07:17AM

  Davis could not make many of the throws

Rams_81407September 25, 2016 07:35AM

  I agree he is a keeper

LesBaker258September 24, 2016 04:38AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn305September 24, 2016 03:56PM

  No rush to get rid of Keenum but

Rams_81228September 25, 2016 07:38AM

  Re: No rush to get rid of Keenum but

zn315September 25, 2016 08:25AM

  Re: Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

SoCalRAMatic371September 23, 2016 05:02AM

  Now, Fisher isn't saying who #2 is for Tampa...

max379September 23, 2016 12:07PM

  Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

NewMexicoRam454September 24, 2016 01:06PM

  Re: Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

zn354September 24, 2016 01:19PM