Quote
zn
And you think that's about Fisher?

Why did Kelly trade him? Well his 2014 wasn't as good as his dismissable 2013 (I was dismissing the 2013 games back when they trade for him, they weren't sustainable and realism dictated that you see the difference between 2014 and 2013).

Why did Fisher trade his franchise QB for Foles, and offer Foles a contract extension before the start of the season? Funny thing is Rams probably have a winning record if Bradford was still with Rams last year. How is that not on Fisher?

Quote
zn
Then he leaves the spread, starts in a pro system, and goes completely to pieces. I personally think he never mastered the pro system. I don't think he was comfortable out there when they got off script.

And then they couldn't trade him.

So according to you, Fisher trades for a QB that couldn't learn his system then Fisher couldn't get anything for the QB when Fisher realized his mistake and cost the team valuable cap space. How is that not on Fisher?

Quote
zn
So did the entire league think, well clearly this is a good qb, look at 2013, obviously Fisher didn't know what to do with him.

Probably not, right? That's not a real possibility. That's only something that comes up on message boards in agenda fights.

Message boards being what they are, the "Fisher ruins qbs" mantra will last until Goff comes through. And of course there's a very good chance they got something out of Mannion too.

If Foles was a good QB or a bad QB that is on Fisher. Fact is Fisher chose Foles, and Foles failed miserably under Fisher.

And what's really funny is that when people talk about message board agendas as if it's a one sided fight, and they are immune to it.


Go Fisher!