August 05, 2016 03:21PM
The trend is multiple guys contributing. Your own "benchmark" (which I don't really agree with) was SB winners.

Not many of these guys got over 1,200 yards the year their team won.


2006 the Colts had Wayne and Harrison both over 1300 yards.

2007 the Giants had Buress just barely break 1000 with 1,025

2008 the Steelers had Ward just break 1,000 yards with 1,043 (15th in the NFL)

2009 the Saints had Colston just break 1,000 yards with 1,074 (18th in the NFL)

2010 the Packers had Jennings cop 1,265 (4th in the NFL)

2011 the Giants had Nicks get 1,192 (12th in the NFL)

2012 the Ravens didn't have anyone on the roster with over 1,000 yards receiving

2013 the Seahawks didn't have anyone on the roster with over 1,000 yards receiving

2014 the Patriots had no WR's with over 1,000 yards but Gronkowski the TE had 1,124. (WR Edelman was 25th in the NFL)

2015 the Broncos had Thomas go for 1,304 and Sanders got 1,135 (7th and 15th in the NFL)

I wonder how many of those guys were in the top 15 in receptions.........

See a trend there or do I need to use crayons?

I'll simplify it. Look at the QB's for the answer.

Do you see many "household names" or potential HOF players or guys who have been to multiple Pro Bowls at the WR spot? Yes we see a few.

At QB?

PManning. Brady. Rodgers. Brees. Russell. Roethlisberger. Flacco. EManning. That is all the guys who got rings in your selected 10 years.

A lot more PB's among the QB's and the WR's get a lot more roster spots as we know. See anyone that won't get into the HOF? I will say Flacco and possibly Russell. The rest will be in.

It's the QB and has been for a long time. Not a "true #1" WR.

The QB and a group of weapons to deploy. The #1 WR is not in fashion right now. Maybe, like clothes, it'll cycle back in but it's been out of fashion and will be for the foreseeable future.

Thanks and enjoy your day.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Some juicy Day 4 tweets from Vinny...

Rams431782August 03, 2016 07:03AM

  Pairing Goff and Higbee as Roomies...

SalsaRama755August 03, 2016 07:50AM

  Yep..That was wise thinking...(NM)

PaulButcher59450August 03, 2016 09:10AM

  Re: Pairing Goff and Higbee as Roomies...

oldmanram736August 03, 2016 09:41AM

  IF they utilize TG correctly in the passing game...

merlin819August 03, 2016 10:02AM

  I can see TG and TA being very effective...

JamesJM596August 03, 2016 10:06AM

  Re: I can see TG and TA being very effective...

Hollywood Ram548August 03, 2016 10:16AM

  Re: I can see TG and TA being very effective...

dzrams589August 03, 2016 12:14PM

  Re: I can see TG and TA being very effective...

JamesHarrisFanClub616August 03, 2016 12:18PM

  Carolina as well.

RustyRay563August 03, 2016 02:01PM

  IMO a true #1 WR is more a "nice to have" than a requirement to win

merlin655August 03, 2016 04:43PM

  It's a myth

LesBaker547August 03, 2016 04:55PM

  Re: Sure wr's are among the most drafted position in the 1st rd for no reason.....

laram626August 03, 2016 05:14PM

  Please that's just a simpletons arguement

LesBaker604August 03, 2016 05:31PM

  Re: Please that's just a simpletons arguement

laram687August 03, 2016 05:36PM

  Well there is the Ravens and Bears

Rams_81623August 04, 2016 03:00AM

  Guess what

LesBaker515August 05, 2016 03:21PM

  Re: LOL...

laram485August 05, 2016 03:36PM

  Name the measure

LesBaker504August 05, 2016 03:47PM

  You are providing this for him

Rams_81545August 05, 2016 03:54PM

  You just made a point for how important the wr is

Rams_81389August 05, 2016 03:48PM

  1,000 yards isn't a big deal

LesBaker441August 05, 2016 03:52PM

  very significant

Rams_81529August 05, 2016 03:58PM

  You've lost your way

LesBaker369August 05, 2016 05:46PM

  Re: 1,000 yards isn't a big deal

zn587August 05, 2016 05:54PM

  Jerry Rice

Rams_81566August 04, 2016 02:59AM

  agree, it's a happy medium

LMU93471August 05, 2016 09:39AM

  I think people are confusing "elite" WR with "#1 WR"

zn605August 03, 2016 06:12PM

  Re: Gronk lines up all over the formation...

laram610August 03, 2016 06:32PM

  Packers totally different team without Nelson

Rams_81535August 04, 2016 03:03AM

  Re: I think people are confusing "elite" WR with "#1 WR"

Ram Rock478August 04, 2016 01:28PM

  Re: I think people are confusing "elite" WR with "#1 WR"

zn488August 05, 2016 09:10AM

  Back On Track...

Ram Rock588August 05, 2016 09:56AM

  I'd rather have significant improvement in TE production than a "true #1 WR"

LesBaker469August 05, 2016 09:39AM

  Re: I'd rather have significant improvement in TE production than a "true #1 WR"

Ram Rock779August 05, 2016 10:03AM

  Totally agree and we haven't had either.

promomasterj511August 04, 2016 01:56PM

  you need somebody to make plays

Rams_81521August 05, 2016 04:00PM