August 04, 2016 01:28PM
I agree Zn. We just need to have someone truly grab the mantle of #1 WR on this team and the rest of the WR's will gain from that. I still hold out hope for Quick and Britt to be those guys. I love Tavon as a playmaker and he will always contend for most TD's on the team, but he is not a #1 in my opinion. I do like the promise of our TE's this season, and I think Higbee & Hemingway are two very promising playmakers that could push Kendricks for more reception production from that group. TE's are a nice security blanket for young QB's and I think Goff early on may lean on them and his RB's out of the backfield as well.

We will see. But man were we spoiled when we had multiple #1 types and elites on the team during the GSOT era! smiling smiley

Later my Friend...







Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/04/2016 01:29PM by Ram Rock.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Some juicy Day 4 tweets from Vinny...

Rams431781August 03, 2016 07:03AM

  Pairing Goff and Higbee as Roomies...

SalsaRama755August 03, 2016 07:50AM

  Yep..That was wise thinking...(NM)

PaulButcher59450August 03, 2016 09:10AM

  Re: Pairing Goff and Higbee as Roomies...

oldmanram736August 03, 2016 09:41AM

  IF they utilize TG correctly in the passing game...

merlin819August 03, 2016 10:02AM

  I can see TG and TA being very effective...

JamesJM596August 03, 2016 10:06AM

  Re: I can see TG and TA being very effective...

Hollywood Ram548August 03, 2016 10:16AM

  Re: I can see TG and TA being very effective...

dzrams588August 03, 2016 12:14PM

  Re: I can see TG and TA being very effective...

JamesHarrisFanClub616August 03, 2016 12:18PM

  Carolina as well.

RustyRay562August 03, 2016 02:01PM

  IMO a true #1 WR is more a "nice to have" than a requirement to win

merlin655August 03, 2016 04:43PM

  It's a myth

LesBaker546August 03, 2016 04:55PM

  Re: Sure wr's are among the most drafted position in the 1st rd for no reason.....

laram626August 03, 2016 05:14PM

  Please that's just a simpletons arguement

LesBaker604August 03, 2016 05:31PM

  Re: Please that's just a simpletons arguement

laram687August 03, 2016 05:36PM

  Well there is the Ravens and Bears

Rams_81623August 04, 2016 03:00AM

  Guess what

LesBaker515August 05, 2016 03:21PM

  Re: LOL...

laram485August 05, 2016 03:36PM

  Name the measure

LesBaker503August 05, 2016 03:47PM

  You are providing this for him

Rams_81545August 05, 2016 03:54PM

  You just made a point for how important the wr is

Rams_81388August 05, 2016 03:48PM

  1,000 yards isn't a big deal

LesBaker441August 05, 2016 03:52PM

  very significant

Rams_81529August 05, 2016 03:58PM

  You've lost your way

LesBaker369August 05, 2016 05:46PM

  Re: 1,000 yards isn't a big deal

zn586August 05, 2016 05:54PM

  Jerry Rice

Rams_81565August 04, 2016 02:59AM

  agree, it's a happy medium

LMU93471August 05, 2016 09:39AM

  I think people are confusing "elite" WR with "#1 WR"

zn605August 03, 2016 06:12PM

  Re: Gronk lines up all over the formation...

laram610August 03, 2016 06:32PM

  Packers totally different team without Nelson

Rams_81535August 04, 2016 03:03AM

  Re: I think people are confusing "elite" WR with "#1 WR"

Ram Rock477August 04, 2016 01:28PM

  Re: I think people are confusing "elite" WR with "#1 WR"

zn487August 05, 2016 09:10AM

  Back On Track...

Ram Rock588August 05, 2016 09:56AM

  I'd rather have significant improvement in TE production than a "true #1 WR"

LesBaker468August 05, 2016 09:39AM

  Re: I'd rather have significant improvement in TE production than a "true #1 WR"

Ram Rock779August 05, 2016 10:03AM

  Totally agree and we haven't had either.

promomasterj509August 04, 2016 01:56PM

  you need somebody to make plays

Rams_81521August 05, 2016 04:00PM