Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Agree with that analysis

January 21, 2024 06:06PM
Quote
alyoshamucci
42 was Standing at 4 yards.

Shoulder contact wad lateral to a player moving behind him.

Player is contacted at 4 yards and the result is that he moves out of the way reeling and gets "close" to five yards.

The ball is not out of mahomes hand at contact.
The player is recovering from the blow after* the ball is released.

Now ... that's not a foul.

If they want to say he was at five yards, it wasn't close. It's just flat wrong and likely why he was setup at 4. He knew based on where he was standing that he could check a crosser.

That said... the other bills player grabbed him right after (ball in the air) so PI in my opinion was warranted.

So I'm weirded out by who they called it on.
Bills had a penalty ... but it wasn't the one they called.

That said ... Diggs needs to catch the ball. That's it. Your best WR drops the game ... you deserve to lose.
You can't force the other team to punt? You deserve to lose.

I didn't like it --- seems like bad call ... but either the TV ref was covering for a bad call or well, he wasn't.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  That P.I. Funny how Refs waited for the outcome of the play and THEN toss a flag.....

Ramgator217January 21, 2024 04:18PM

  Terrible call and the booth ref backed it up

Hazlet Hacksaw83January 21, 2024 04:20PM

  Re: That P.I. Funny how Refs waited for the outcome of the play and THEN toss a flag.....

kw1362January 21, 2024 04:20PM

  They had to. Had to know if ball was out or not.

JimYoungblood5370January 21, 2024 04:21PM

  Nsntz saw through it badly missed it

Hazlet Hacksaw70January 21, 2024 04:22PM

  Not according to the ref.

JimYoungblood5360January 21, 2024 04:24PM

  Still not buying it

Hazlet Hacksaw57January 21, 2024 04:25PM

  You don't have to buy it.

JimYoungblood5361January 21, 2024 04:26PM

  Re: Not according to the ref.

alyoshamucci51January 21, 2024 05:28PM

  Agree with that analysis

JimYoungblood5349January 21, 2024 06:06PM

  Re: Not according to the ref.

Classicalwit50January 21, 2024 06:08PM