That makes sense

Quote
LMU93
Yeah. They are a data point. Not the data point. Which is fine. With Ramsey, If he's not the 3rd-best CB in the league he's in the top 5. If Wagner wasn't the top ILB last year he was top 3. They're not wildly off... But of course anything like their system has a degree of subjectivity to it. It's not science.

and is fair--here are Ramsey's grades over the years--I happen to agree with merlin that Ramsey was not as good in 2022 as he was in 2021 and their full grades show that. His coverage grade was down, but his run grade what up and his pass rush grade was up (Star position related) so even though he played
less of Star in 2022 than 2021 (about the same as in 2020 under Staley, not exactly but in the ballpark) he was more effective at it.

And of course, they break down man and zone and our CBs much worse in man coverage than zone, but all they do is insult the coordinator in ignorance, even after they've been proven wrong over and over. But hey, some people lack any personal pride, they like playing the fool, I guess. Saying things without any contexts or proof.

PFF, PFR, SIS and others give context and proof--it stops the lies, that is one of the several uses, though not the only one. For those with open minds it can be a learning opportunity.