Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: they were until the new CBA

April 09, 2020 05:33PM
Quote
Florida_Ram
Quote
zn
Trading or cutting Gurley before the new CBA would have been prohibitive because until the new CBA was signed, there was no June 1 option.

Once the new CBA was voted in there was suddenly a June 1st option again.

Without the June 1st option for Gurley are least, cutting or trading them both would have been complete cap disaster. The hit would have been too high.

The June 1st option at least partially addresses that, making it much more do-able.

So the people who were saying earlier on it would have cost too much were right--until the June 1 option kicked in with the new CBA, it was too much.

...

Makes sense zn but the CBA was always in play even though it was not voted and agreed on prior to predictions.

Even still... The Rams could've cut Gurley regardless of the CBA and Cooks got traded for more than a bag of chips.

I get your point and you would be a good attorney defending the populous..


Go Rams!!!

Never doubt the McVay and Snead era...

They don't sit on their hands regardless of draft capitol and salary cap.

No people were not aware that with the CBA expired there was no June 1 option. And it is simply true that until that option existed the cost of cutting him would have been far too much.

As for Snead/McVay doubt, that's a mixed bag on this issue. They traded for Cooks and signed him to a top 2nd contract, then 2 years later unload him. They signed Gurley to a huge deal, then a year later unload him. Those are the actions of people who are learning from mistakes, which is not the same as already knowing what you're doing.

And so saying they don't sit on their hands because of draft capital is ironic, since they themselves are the reason they don't have draft capital. And saying they act regardless of cap space is equally ironic, since they're the ones who set up the cap space issues.

I like the Snead/McVay era but I don't think that every move they make is proof of genius. I think some moves they make are proof that they are learning some things the hard way.

....



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/09/2020 05:38PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So many on this board thought Gurley & Cooks were stuck

Anonymous User729April 09, 2020 04:50PM

  Re: So many on this board thought Gurley & Cooks were stuck

Classicalwit231April 09, 2020 05:00PM

  Mid to low, yes

Ram_Ruler246April 09, 2020 05:03PM

  Re: Any type of 2nd is good value...nm

dzrams235April 09, 2020 05:06PM

  Re: So many on this board thought Gurley & Cooks were stuck

Rams43239April 09, 2020 05:13PM

  Re: So many on this board thought Gurley & Cooks were stuck

RAMSINCE ARNETT147April 10, 2020 07:45AM

  Re: So many on this board thought Gurley & Cooks were stuck

Rams43146April 10, 2020 07:52AM

  Re: So many on this board thought Gurley & Cooks were stuck

The Professor164April 10, 2020 08:15AM

  Re I thought Gurley could be cut for sure

Speed_Kills227April 09, 2020 05:07PM

  I thought Gurley could be cut for sure: Fair enough speed

Anonymous User307April 09, 2020 05:21PM

  Re: yup and ok nm

Speed_Kills195April 09, 2020 05:35PM

  they were until the new CBA

zn296April 09, 2020 05:15PM

  Re: they were until the new CBA

Anonymous User354April 09, 2020 05:27PM

  Re: they were until the new CBA

zn210April 09, 2020 05:33PM

  Re: they were until the new CBA

dzrams182April 09, 2020 05:34PM

  Re: they were until the new CBA

zn183April 09, 2020 05:36PM

  Re: they were until the new CBA

dzrams149April 09, 2020 06:10PM

  NFL is a brutal sport.....injuries only reason they're gone.

Rampage2K-177April 09, 2020 05:41PM

  Re: Its a shame

Speed_Kills278April 09, 2020 07:02PM

  Re: Its a shame

Rampage2K-188April 09, 2020 07:13PM

  Cooks was a malcontent? Even "kinda" a malcontent?

Suh-weet!368April 09, 2020 07:09PM

  Re: Cooks was a malcontent? Even "kinda" a malcontent?

Rampage2K-209April 09, 2020 07:16PM

  Re: Cooks was a malcontent? Even "kinda" a malcontent?

zn237April 10, 2020 05:22AM

  Re: Cooks was a malcontent? Even "kinda" a malcontent?

Rams43245April 10, 2020 07:07AM

  Re: Cooks was a malcontent? Even "kinda" a malcontent?

Rampage2K-408April 10, 2020 07:51AM

  Re: from what I understand in New Orleans

Speed_Kills190April 10, 2020 08:24AM

  Re: Cooks was a malcontent? Even "kinda" a malcontent?

zn175April 10, 2020 08:26AM

  Re: yeah malcontent and locker room problem

Speed_Kills196April 10, 2020 08:19AM

  Re: yeah malcontent and locker room problem

Rampage2K-178April 10, 2020 08:31AM