Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Possible twist on the Brockers/Floyd signings?

March 27, 2020 03:57PM
[profootballtalk.nbcsports.com]

The Rams are low on cap space, and they have pending deals with former Bears linebacker Leonard Floyd and nearly Ravens defensive lineman Michael Brockers. With the Floyd deal still not finalized, the Rams worked out a deal with Brockers, whose unsigned agreement with the Ravens fell through. Currently, both Floyd and Brockers are technically unsigned by the Rams, while they await physicals. Before those physicals are passed and the contracts become effective, the Rams will have to create cap space in order to fit both players onto the active roster.

It’s a loophole that has allowed the Rams to squat on both players while figuring out the best way to manage the cap and absorb the contracts. Or maybe, as some are wondering, the Floyd deal will be scrapped, now that Brockers is back, with a three-year, $31.5 million contract.

And it would be easy to avoid the Floyd deal, which pays out $10 million for one year. Rams doctors need to simply conclude that he can’t pass a physical. Also caught up in this potential mess is free-agent defensive tackle A’Shawn Robinson, whose two-year, $17 million contract has not been signed.

However it plays out, the Rams are benefiting from the turbulent atmosphere engulfing normal NFL business, one that has allowed agreements in principle to be struck and to be held indefinitely in limbo until proper physicals can be administered. By the time that the COVID-19 pandemic eases to the point that physicals can occur, the Rams will either create cap space elsewhere (if players with existing contracts will agree to restructure), or the Rams will simply keep only one or two of the three players, telling Brockers and/or Floyd and/or Robinson that their deals won’t be finalized, with the failed physical providing the quick and easy “get out of jail free” card.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Possible twist on the Brockers/Floyd signings?

Rams43874March 27, 2020 03:53PM

  Re: Possible twist on the Brockers/Floyd signings?

Rams43396March 27, 2020 03:57PM

  Re: Possible twist on the Brockers/Floyd signings?

NorCalRamFan373March 27, 2020 04:00PM

  Re: Can we stop with the 'trade Cooks' idea?

AlbaNY_Ram370March 27, 2020 04:26PM

  I don't think they want to trade him

Ram_Ruler254March 27, 2020 06:23PM

  Re: I don't think they want to trade him

AlbaNY_Ram265March 27, 2020 06:58PM

  Re: I don't think they want to trade him

NorCalRamFan304March 27, 2020 08:57PM

  That would come at some cost

Suh-weet!311March 27, 2020 04:26PM

  Re: That would come at some cost

Classicalwit280March 27, 2020 08:02PM

  Re: Possible twist on the Brockers/Floyd signings?

Classicalwit296March 27, 2020 08:00PM