Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I like your take.

February 15, 2018 06:17AM
The kind of numbers and thoughts you have on Watkins aren't far from mine.

He might be able to be a more prolific receiver in a different offense on a different team. And I have little doubt that an offseason with Goff and a full training camp and we'll see more attempts thrown his direction.

But the Rams offense simply is not going to feature the 1200 yard WR with the other guys getting the leftovers. It's going to be spread around. And we have to remember how much McVay leans towards TEs. And last year the TEs were only marginally involved in the passing game (you can bet all that can be done to remedy that is going to happen in FA or the draft). So if any position sees more passes going their way next season, it's going to be the TE unit. That means even FEWER attempts to the WRs or MORE passing and less running (doesn't sound like McVay).

Either Watkins wraps his head around the concept that he is NOT going to be the big Cahuna on the Rams; he's NOT going to get a Dez Bryant, Julio Jones type deal or get as many passes thrown his way as those kinds of guys do; but rather he is a complementary piece. If he can't live with that, and get paid like that (a Robert Woods sized contract), then it is best to just let him walk, eat the 2nd round pick loss, and move on rather than hamstringing the team by spending too much money on a position that doesn't warrant it. Especially when there are other players we need to retain, and a couple of holes we need to fill.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Five moves the Rams should make this offseason/ESPN

RamBill1169February 15, 2018 04:39AM

  I agree with this view.

RockRam448February 15, 2018 05:28AM

  Re: I agree with this view.

LMU93252February 15, 2018 06:01AM

  I like your take.

RockRam248February 15, 2018 06:17AM

  Re: I like your take.

LMU93340February 15, 2018 06:32AM

  FWIW, I’m resonating with the views of Rock/93 here...

Rams43228February 15, 2018 07:08AM

  Re: I agree with this view.

reggae165February 16, 2018 10:58AM

  How is Snead not crucified for that Austin deal?

Ram49372February 15, 2018 06:52AM

  Re: How is Snead not crucified for that Austin deal?

stlramz264February 15, 2018 07:11AM

  Re: How is Snead not crucified for that Austin deal?

Rams43254February 15, 2018 07:11AM

  Re: Besides

RamsFanSinceLA226February 15, 2018 07:13AM

  Re: seems Snead gets credit for the good but Fisher for Austin

Speed_Kills358February 15, 2018 08:40AM

  Re: Because Snead is made of Teflon, see Ram 43...

spagsbacker280February 15, 2018 08:47AM

  or

zn187February 16, 2018 08:02AM

  Re: or

stlramz190February 16, 2018 08:53PM

  Re: or

zn161February 16, 2018 08:57PM

  Re: or

Speedball89138February 19, 2018 04:48PM

  Really? Sorry, but that is sooooo over the top.

RockRam231February 15, 2018 09:27AM

  because

zn255February 15, 2018 10:44AM

  Re: because

LMU93309February 16, 2018 03:19AM

  Re: because

zn212February 16, 2018 06:33AM

  Re: because

LMU93227February 16, 2018 06:55AM

  Re: because

zn161February 16, 2018 07:17AM

  Re: This line right here is enough justification...

dzrams270February 16, 2018 08:18AM

  Re: This line right here is enough justification...

zn168February 16, 2018 03:20PM

  Re: Nah....

laram224February 19, 2018 05:13PM

  Re: Nah....

Rampage2K-129February 19, 2018 05:38PM

  Re: Nah....

zn159February 19, 2018 06:53PM

  Re: Nah....

dzrams132February 19, 2018 07:20PM

  Re: How is Snead not crucified for that Austin deal?...Agree 49.

oldschoolramfan189February 16, 2018 10:15AM

  Re: How is Snead not crucified for that Austin deal?...Agree 49.

MamaRAMa185February 16, 2018 10:20AM

  Re: I hate it when people....

dzrams275February 15, 2018 10:49AM

  Re: I hate it when people....GOOD POINT

BumRap213February 15, 2018 07:31PM

  That is because Barnwell is looking at stats, not film on Watkins

Blue and Gold211February 15, 2018 07:42PM