Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I think you're probably right, Grits.

September 23, 2016 02:12AM
I think it is all about preparing Goff and while they like Mannion their focus in on preparing Goff to be the starter and he will grow and learn more as the number 2.

Keenum is there to see if they can win a few games before Goff takes over and the main goal is for Goff to be successful when he finally gets the start.

It would not surprise me if Keenum has issues in the next game or 2 or 3 that Goff relieves him and gets some time.

If Goff does well he will he will start or shows good promise he will finally take over.

Longer term Mannion will be the 2 and I do not expect them to pay Keenum 3 Mil + next year.

I think this is how Fisher saw things unfolding all the time and that he wants to keep the pressure off Goff as much as possible while helping him get acclimated to being a starting QB in the NFL.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

GreatRamNTheSky1050September 22, 2016 12:33PM

  I think you're probably right, Grits.

JamesJM470September 22, 2016 05:23PM

  Re: I think you're probably right, Grits.

David Deacon391September 23, 2016 02:12AM

  I don't think we can look at it that way.

RockRam434September 23, 2016 03:40AM

  Yeah, I agree with all that...

max458September 23, 2016 03:57AM

  Why get rid of Keenum

Hazlet Hacksaw390September 23, 2016 04:14AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

LMU93406September 23, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn384September 23, 2016 05:19AM

  I can see advantages both ways

LMU93399September 23, 2016 05:25AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

zn367September 23, 2016 05:31AM

  Re: I can see advantages both ways

LMU93358September 23, 2016 06:03AM

  I sure hope Mannion is the plan

moklerman369September 24, 2016 02:11AM

  Yes, the money matters.

RockRam357September 23, 2016 03:56PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams398September 23, 2016 03:40PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn345September 23, 2016 05:05PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

dzrams276September 23, 2016 11:46PM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn386September 24, 2016 04:10AM

  Re: We did not stick with Davis

BumRap330September 24, 2016 07:14PM

  after 3 consecutive complete collapse games

zn361September 24, 2016 08:27PM

  What are we to assume?

moklerman350September 25, 2016 12:01AM

  Compare that to other backups

LesBaker302September 25, 2016 06:26AM

  +1

zn326September 25, 2016 07:28AM

  Re: Compare that to other backups

moklerman310September 25, 2016 08:18AM

  zn, you've resisted ascribing win rates to QBs

ArizonaRamFan336September 25, 2016 06:14AM

  and I still do

zn332September 25, 2016 07:17AM

  Davis could not make many of the throws

Rams_81403September 25, 2016 07:35AM

  I agree he is a keeper

LesBaker256September 24, 2016 04:38AM

  Re: Why get rid of Keenum

zn305September 24, 2016 03:56PM

  No rush to get rid of Keenum but

Rams_81225September 25, 2016 07:38AM

  Re: No rush to get rid of Keenum but

zn312September 25, 2016 08:25AM

  Re: Okay, so, Goff is number 2 this week again

SoCalRAMatic367September 23, 2016 05:02AM

  Now, Fisher isn't saying who #2 is for Tampa...

max377September 23, 2016 12:07PM

  Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

NewMexicoRam450September 24, 2016 01:06PM

  Re: Man, why can't we have one of those teams....?

zn351September 24, 2016 01:19PM