Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Mike Jordan, Hill value

May 01, 2017 09:53AM
I think it's worth mentioning there is a high degree of chance that our two young corners impressed in predraft workouts and on last years film along with a vote from Fassel to make CB less of a draft priority than we thought coming into the event.

We passed on a few chances to select some pretty talented guys.
Maybe would have taken King or Conley if they were staring at us at 37 and we don't get one of Kupp ,Everett or Johnson.

Or maybe we get Johnson in the forth and miss the LB ?

I'd be ok with that also.
smiling smiley

Point is Hill and Jordan along the the other two Vets and the rookie MISSOU corner we signed are pretty good depth to start with.
More that what was perceived pre~draftt



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/01/2017 09:56AM by CraigMatson.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Mike Jordan, Hill value

CraigMatson889May 01, 2017 09:53AM

  Jordan a keeper, Hill is a bonehead

TonyHunter87297May 01, 2017 10:13AM

  Re: Jordan a keeper, Hill is a bonehead

CraigMatson251May 01, 2017 10:29AM

  Re: Jordan a keeper, Hill is a bonehead

Hollywood Ram231May 01, 2017 11:09AM

  Re: Jordan a keeper, Hill is a bonehead

TonyHunter87307May 01, 2017 11:16AM

  Yep!

RFIP206May 01, 2017 11:18AM

  Re: Yep!

bigjimram21497May 01, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: Yep!

CraigMatson317May 01, 2017 12:27PM

  Re: Jordan a keeper, Hill is a bonehead

CraigMatson205May 01, 2017 11:22AM

  Jordan vs Hill

LMU93171May 02, 2017 03:17AM

  I think both provide depth as well as the kid from the Jags

ferragamo79221May 01, 2017 11:22AM

  Re: I think both provide depth as well as the kid from the Jags

TonyHunter87218May 01, 2017 12:04PM

  Blake Countess???

ferragamo79216May 01, 2017 12:23PM

  Re: Blake Countess???

CraigMatson195May 01, 2017 12:41PM

  Oh, he was still showing on the roster

ferragamo79181May 01, 2017 02:50PM

  I thought

PARAM194May 01, 2017 03:24PM

  I thought Countess was still a Ram (nm)

zn323May 01, 2017 05:42PM