Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: This rationale is also why... dz dz dz.... logic

April 07, 2020 03:44PM
Quote
Florida_Ram
Quote
dzrams

The reasons Snead gives in this article are why I also don't see it making sense to splurge on a top 5 RB that requires pick 52.

Nah, I see them using a 3rd at most and likely a 4th round pick on someone like Zach Moss to complement Henderson.

I have to agree with your sound logic dz.

The only way I could vision the Rams drafting a RB at #52, is if he's one of the top two highest rated RB's in the entire draft on their board.

And.... their other favorite projections at different position groups have to be drafted and not available etc...

Agreed. At some point, if a RB was by far the BPA that would cause them to deviate from a general plan to draft one later.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Les Snead: Cutting Gurley Wasn't All About Money

Ram49618April 07, 2020 10:33AM

  Re: Les Snead: We Will Use Multiple RBs

Ram49447April 07, 2020 10:54AM

  I agree. That's been the Patriots formula

NewMexicoRam223April 07, 2020 01:39PM

  Re: This rationale is also why...

dzrams337April 07, 2020 02:32PM

  This rationale is also why... dz dz dz.... logic

Anonymous User233April 07, 2020 02:51PM

  Re: This rationale is also why... dz dz dz.... logic

dzrams184April 07, 2020 03:44PM

  IDK DZ

Deadpool220April 07, 2020 03:00PM

  Re: IDK DZ

dzrams200April 07, 2020 03:40PM

  Agreed, just wanted to play a little bit of devils advocate

Deadpool247April 07, 2020 04:12PM

  the more I read and watch of him..

OzRam347April 08, 2020 06:33AM

  Re: the more I read and watch of him..

dzrams173April 08, 2020 07:07AM

  Re: This rationale is also why...

Rampage2K-284April 07, 2020 03:45PM

  Yes, I think in today's game multiple RB's is a sound strategy...

JamesJM222April 07, 2020 02:40PM

  Good idea--

JimYoungblood53140April 07, 2020 03:11PM

  Re: Good idea--

OzRam234April 08, 2020 06:36AM