Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: That didn't occur to me

August 12, 2017 07:24AM
Quote
PHDram
But maybe. The way he talks it seems as though they liked for some time. Interesting point.

That's just plain not how they ran the draft.

No Rams pick was "on" anyone. In fact they were "on" everyone.

If Snead didn;t want a guy ranked high all he would have to do is say so. The Rams policy was, if anyone at the top (ie. higher than a scout) didn't want a pick they wouldn't pick the guy. If they didn;t have consensus on a guy he wouldn't be in consideration.

These are just the facts as we know them after listening to endless post-draft press conferences by Demoff, Fisher, and Snead and after reading several local and national reporters who got some inside views of the process.

And the idea that they wouldn't let controversies out of the inner circle is false too. We know all about several controversies, like the fact that Fisher was upset that they didn't sign Jenkins.

Honest, there's real evidence out there, and all anyone has to do is look for it.

Endless speculation about who picked which guy, in the light of that evidence, is just made up nothing.


....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Does the Watkins trade hint that GRob was not on Snead?

max492August 12, 2017 06:52AM

  That didn't occur to me

PHDram212August 12, 2017 07:06AM

  Re: That didn't occur to me

zn175August 12, 2017 07:24AM

  Yup...

max119August 12, 2017 10:49AM

  It's impossible to say without being there

9er8er110August 12, 2017 11:15AM

  Re: It's impossible to say without being there

zn116August 12, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: It's impossible to say without being there

9er8er129August 12, 2017 01:20PM

  You better be careful

PHDram111August 12, 2017 01:16PM

  A correct but nuanced reading

RFL111August 12, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: A correct but nuanced reading

zn118August 12, 2017 11:19AM