Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile


Re: John Sullivan

March 20, 2017 05:39PM
Sullivan spent the 2016 season with the Washington Redskins, which means he is a familiar face for Sean McVay. Sullivan was extremely healthy and reliable in Minnesota as he spent 7 seasons there and almost every year started 16 games. His 2015 season was injury riddled, and ultimately the Vikings decided to move on. Sullivan then latched on in Washington last season and made an appearance in 13 games.

The addition of John Sullivan would likely only spell as a short term fix as he’s 31 years old, but for a guy with experience in McVay’s scheme, and more help for the Rams line, it can only be a good thing.


The Rams are clearly in the market for a new center after they released Tim Barnes a few weeks ago. Los Angeles actually signed Bills restricted free agent C Ryan Groy to an offer sheet, but Buffalo elected to match their tender.

Sullivan, 31, is a former sixth-round pick of the Vikings back in 2008. He had two years remaining on his six-year, $25.6 million contract when the Vikings cut him loose coming out of the preseason after they were unable to find a trade partner.

The Redskins signed him to a contract a few weeks into the regular season and finished out the year in Washington.

Sullivan missed all of 2015, due to multiple back surgeries.

In 2016, Sullivan appeared in 13 games for the Redskins and played a total of 98 snaps for the Redskins, according to Pro Football Focus.


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2017 05:42PM by den-the-coach.

  Center in for a visit

CROMWELL211580March 20, 2017 05:22PM

  John Sullivan

den-the-coach399March 20, 2017 05:30PM

  Re: John Sullivan

PHDram336March 20, 2017 05:35PM

  Re: John Sullivan

den-the-coach383March 20, 2017 05:39PM

  Groy just looks so much better. What am I missing???

Atlantic Ram154March 21, 2017 09:15AM

  Buffalo wants to keep him

PHDram157March 21, 2017 09:18AM

  I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

Atlantic Ram125March 21, 2017 10:03AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

RamsFanSinceLA155March 21, 2017 10:43AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

Classicalwit141March 22, 2017 03:58AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

Ohiorams111March 22, 2017 04:36AM

  Post draft cuts....

Killrazor120March 22, 2017 05:09AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

CraigMatson93March 22, 2017 11:09AM

  decent stop gap option

LMU93245March 21, 2017 03:08AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

zn189March 21, 2017 04:16AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

LMU93174March 21, 2017 04:49AM

  This is exactly correct

PHDram144March 21, 2017 05:22AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

CraigMatson141March 21, 2017 06:50AM

  actually that's not accurate

zn149March 22, 2017 04:24AM

  Re: actually that's not accurate

CraigMatson92March 22, 2017 05:20AM

  Re: actually that's not accurate

zn110March 22, 2017 06:38AM

  does it really matter?

PHDram134March 22, 2017 05:34AM


zn94March 22, 2017 06:36AM

  Re: No

TonyHunter8793March 22, 2017 10:03AM

  Re: No

CraigMatson95March 22, 2017 10:56AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

leafnose163March 21, 2017 04:17AM

  Re: John Sullivan

Rams43181March 21, 2017 07:11AM

  Re: John Sullivan

PHDram153March 21, 2017 07:28AM

  Re: John Sullivan

bigjimram21147March 21, 2017 08:24AM

  Re: John Sullivan He's a Golden Domer......

oldschoolramfan152March 21, 2017 09:21AM

  Re: Center in for a visit

CraigMatson330March 20, 2017 05:50PM

  Re: Center in for a visit

Classicalwit245March 21, 2017 04:07AM

  looks like no trade for groy

PHDram244March 23, 2017 06:28AM