Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile


Re: John Sullivan

March 20, 2017 05:39PM
Sullivan spent the 2016 season with the Washington Redskins, which means he is a familiar face for Sean McVay. Sullivan was extremely healthy and reliable in Minnesota as he spent 7 seasons there and almost every year started 16 games. His 2015 season was injury riddled, and ultimately the Vikings decided to move on. Sullivan then latched on in Washington last season and made an appearance in 13 games.

The addition of John Sullivan would likely only spell as a short term fix as he’s 31 years old, but for a guy with experience in McVay’s scheme, and more help for the Rams line, it can only be a good thing.


The Rams are clearly in the market for a new center after they released Tim Barnes a few weeks ago. Los Angeles actually signed Bills restricted free agent C Ryan Groy to an offer sheet, but Buffalo elected to match their tender.

Sullivan, 31, is a former sixth-round pick of the Vikings back in 2008. He had two years remaining on his six-year, $25.6 million contract when the Vikings cut him loose coming out of the preseason after they were unable to find a trade partner.

The Redskins signed him to a contract a few weeks into the regular season and finished out the year in Washington.

Sullivan missed all of 2015, due to multiple back surgeries.

In 2016, Sullivan appeared in 13 games for the Redskins and played a total of 98 snaps for the Redskins, according to Pro Football Focus.


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2017 05:42PM by den-the-coach.

  Center in for a visit

CROMWELL211484March 20, 2017 05:22PM

  John Sullivan

den-the-coach377March 20, 2017 05:30PM

  Re: John Sullivan

PHDram314March 20, 2017 05:35PM

  Re: John Sullivan

den-the-coach301March 20, 2017 05:39PM

  Groy just looks so much better. What am I missing???

Atlantic Ram133March 21, 2017 09:15AM

  Buffalo wants to keep him

PHDram109March 21, 2017 09:18AM

  I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

Atlantic Ram107March 21, 2017 10:03AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

RamsFanSinceLA113March 21, 2017 10:43AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

Classicalwit95March 22, 2017 03:58AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

Ohiorams86March 22, 2017 04:36AM

  Post draft cuts....

Killrazor90March 22, 2017 05:09AM

  Re: I'm sure they do but why does Groy look better?

CraigMatson65March 22, 2017 11:09AM

  decent stop gap option

LMU93227March 21, 2017 03:08AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

zn168March 21, 2017 04:16AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

LMU93156March 21, 2017 04:49AM

  This is exactly correct

PHDram127March 21, 2017 05:22AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

CraigMatson121March 21, 2017 06:50AM

  actually that's not accurate

zn95March 22, 2017 04:24AM

  Re: actually that's not accurate

CraigMatson74March 22, 2017 05:20AM

  Re: actually that's not accurate

zn65March 22, 2017 06:38AM

  does it really matter?

PHDram90March 22, 2017 05:34AM


zn74March 22, 2017 06:36AM

  Re: No

TonyHunter8775March 22, 2017 10:03AM

  Re: No

CraigMatson57March 22, 2017 10:56AM

  Re: decent stop gap option

leafnose144March 21, 2017 04:17AM

  Re: John Sullivan

Rams43165March 21, 2017 07:11AM

  Re: John Sullivan

PHDram136March 21, 2017 07:28AM

  Re: John Sullivan

bigjimram21128March 21, 2017 08:24AM

  Re: John Sullivan He's a Golden Domer......

oldschoolramfan134March 21, 2017 09:21AM

  Re: Center in for a visit

CraigMatson311March 20, 2017 05:50PM

  Re: Center in for a visit

Classicalwit227March 21, 2017 04:07AM

  looks like no trade for groy

PHDram197March 23, 2017 06:28AM