Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Yes but it is not an absolute rule

March 19, 2017 07:23AM
Though, Analytics is always involved: Door 1, Door 2, Door 3 what is the better result of various options

If the Rams can make it work where they can retain Johnson and be in position to retain Donald, I would agree. i.e. Don't want some kind of false panic like Ziggy did when he ran Fletcher out of town, having money to work it under the cap, but pretending like he did not, but if there is any way signing Johnson causes you to lose Donald, I believe this is an analytical better of the two scenarios.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams should work the Packers for Johnson Trade

Rams_81769March 19, 2017 05:08AM

  Re: Rams should work the Packers for Johnson Trade

RFIP211March 19, 2017 05:54AM

  Re: Rams should work the Packers for Johnson Trade

RounderRick181March 19, 2017 06:47AM

  Yes but it is not an absolute rule

Rams_81150March 19, 2017 07:23AM

  Re: Rams should work the Packers for Johnson Trade

Rams43171March 19, 2017 07:35AM

  Re Donald

Ram_in_Oz180March 19, 2017 07:45AM

  Re: Re Donald

RounderRick135March 19, 2017 12:18PM

  There is no way they can let Donald go...

max91March 20, 2017 02:57AM

  Re: The Rams already have the money to retain Donald

dzrams140March 19, 2017 05:05PM

  How much cap room they got

ferragamo79157March 19, 2017 07:11PM

  Re: How much cap room they got

dzrams170March 19, 2017 07:59PM

  Re: How much cap room they got

zn169March 19, 2017 10:03PM

  Re: Bingo!

dzrams172March 19, 2017 10:31PM