Yes I agree finding a lt outside of the first 2 rounds is challenging and even then you stand a better chance in the first. If they strike out in fa I'm all for a trade up into the late first.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
Yeah that's a possibility but the rams have not demonstrated that type of aggressive for oline. Well see.. Another interesting guy crosby from Detroit. He will definitely be available. He has played alot of lt in the nfl but he did in college and imo demonstrated the athleticism to play the spot.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
So one option may be terron armstead. The saints apparently signed ramcyk. I kinda thought they would go the opposite direction but ramcyk is younger. Can they afford both? They also need a qb. Both Winston and hill will both be fas as well. I think its a good chance armsead hits the fa market. And if not I'd favor a trade up as I agree finding a starting lt even in the 2nd can be challenging.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
There are always options. Some are just better than others.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
Can NO afford both? Not to mention the only qb under contract in 2022 is the kid they drafted in like the 3rd or 4th rd.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
But that's alot of money for 2 cbs. I think DW is a great player but I just don't think they will invest in another cb. IMO their priority will be to secure a LT.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
adopted by the Supreme Court of the to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms. Nor is it simple. If it were we wouldn't be having the conversation.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
#1 yes not ALL people in any given state share any given belief. i guess i thought that was obvious. #2. the difference here seems to be that you are taking a normative approach to the issue while im taking a positive approach. im not particularly concerned with how things should be but rather how they are. a normative approach imo is largely an academic exercise that is not based in real woby PHDram - Bucky's Pub
ok. but the bottom line is production. so not only does hollins demonstrate an overall better athletic profile but at least to date he has outperformed obo on the field. that being said, im sure obo will get his shot this year.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
Some states like Texas for instance will likely view the issue as a personal decision.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
Imo justin hollins is the best option opposite floyd and he demonstrated on the field last year.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
but the federal government does mandate any vaccine. that is a state right/power i believe?by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
Xby PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
Neither are you.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
How fate you "pile on" like that. You need a lesson in posting etiquette.by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
Send an email to Helen Bramswell and ask her. She wrote the story. Here is her Twitter accountby PHDram - Bucky's Pub
History teaches us alot...by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
A team can cut or trade any player it wants covid or not covid. Further the opt out rules of last year were the result of collective bargaining between players and owners. They freely CHOOSE those rules. The same goes for the rules this year. Why not respect those choices even if you may disagree with them?by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
You said: Viruses do not give a single damm about American narcissistic ideas of free choice. Just as cigarette smoke does not care whether or not you mean to affect others by smoking indoors in a closed environment full of people (which is why we have no smoking laws, your individual "choice" in the matter being irrelevant--there are areas of life where public safety transcends theby PHDram - Bucky's Pub
But yet according to the NY times the US is one of the most vaccinated countries. Perhaps humans are just narcissistic every? Source:by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
If you support individual liberty so strongly why are you opposed to an individuals choice to opt out? Such a position seems to run counter to your core beliefs. Moreover maybe I missed it but I didn't see anything in the article about opting out.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
When they drafted him but what the hell do we know?by PHDram - RamsFootballFans.com
Is not a corporation? You don't think the drug companies who developed the vaccine are making millions? And hospitals? Lol.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
You are ok telling the .01 percent (whoever they are..maybe someone you know and who may be totally healthy otherwise) to sacrifice themselves for a bunch of total strangers? That's a tough sell imo. Personally I think it's better messaging to encourage people to protect themselves and their loved ones.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
Obviously the nature vs nurture debate is something people have speculated for years so I don't have a definitive answer but my own 2 cents is that humans have been and always will be motivated by self interest so I come down more on the self interest side. However I do believe that I'd we accept that premise yiu can use the knowledge to design effective public policy.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
Humans have always acted in self interest. In fact communities organized because individuals realized they were individually safer in a community than on their own. The trick is to make individual self interest also benefit society.by PHDram - Bucky's Pub
I'm not sure what you would like me to explain. I'm sure it's a difficult situation for your son and others like him. I can feel for that. However I made no comment on if getting the vaccine is good or bad. Rationale choice theory is an attempt to explain human behavior which imo it does very well. As the theory suggests people will normally do what is best for them so appeals to our altruisticby PHDram - Bucky's Pub