Yesterday many went skill and DB etc and we went lines. Today many are going lines and we need DBs and skill. When every zigs we zagby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Especially an older rookie like Hookerby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Seems to me every team passed on Branch though. It was not just usby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Word is he was getting a lot of attention and rising up the boards. I do think he brings pass rush to the middle. I think the focus is being to disrupt with 4by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Yeah I noticed this pattern of getting late starters who bloomed quickly. I think they are looking for guys with a upward trajectory, in other words, seems like they put that in the equation to say find guys we can get in lower rounds that would have been in higher rounds with another year of play. Let's get them for their breakout year where they would become a day one pick. I think this migby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
GG coming out of college 6'1" 312, Kobie Turner is 6'2" 288 at the combine but apparently 293by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Those backfield RB tackles reminded me a lot of AD. Thanks for posting, I actually got a little excited.by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Maybe one of them will still be there when we pick next, things are all over the placeby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
True, but he was a JC player who was not on any radar, dude was signed off the street basically and played two years of high level football onlyby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
That is who I was thinking we were going to pick at 77 so if he is available I would be all over thatby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Getting one a pro team where he focus full time and grow in strength and technique and learning from AD etc he has a chance to explodeby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
We have 3 starters need 8 more. I expect a couple of edge picks starting with our next pick, The run on WR does not help, but will force us to actually go defense which is goodby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
first trade 2 for 2by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
we gave up 191 as wellby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
No 69 and 191 for 73 and 161 No 73 for 89 and 128by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
finally got into the 4th roundby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
161 :p. and just kiddingby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
we have to trade up from 77by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Was this an over-reaction to the Humphrey mistake?by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
Always a commercial break as soon as the Rams are on the clockby headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com
If Hooker falls to us do you grab him?by headslapper - RamsFootballFans.com